Here’s an interesting blog I came across about how EA is not simply concerned with creating models:
Myth: “Enterprise Architecture is a discipline aimed at creating models”
I quite like the analogy X-Rays and EA models.
Here’s an interesting blog I came across about how EA is not simply concerned with creating models:
Myth: “Enterprise Architecture is a discipline aimed at creating models”
I quite like the analogy X-Rays and EA models.
The University is adopting a ‘light touch’ TOGAF approach to Enterprise Architecture (EA). TOGAF, which stands for The Open Group Architecture Framework, is an EA methodology and framework. It is designed to support the four commonly accepted domains of EA:
One of the most important aspects of TOGAF, and almost certainly the most widely recognised part, is the Architecture Development Model (ADM).
The ADM is a step-by-step approach to developing an enterprise architecture, and a cycle of the ADM is essentially an EA project. The ADM consists of a number of phases that are iteratively repeated with frequent validation against the organisation’s current requirements. TOGAF defines the steps within each ADM phase are defined in detail.
During the Preliminary phase, which takes place before an organisation can begin its first EA project using TOGAF, the “where, what, why, who, and how we do architecture” in the enterprise is defined. During the Architecture Vision phase the scope of the cycle or project is determined, stakeholders identified and a high-level architecture vision created – is is essentially the project start-up. It is important to carefully define the scope in terms of breadth, depth and time period based on what is to be achieved and what resources are available. Trying to tackle too much will generate a huge architecture project that could well be impossible to complete, whereas a too small or too specific scope could provide something that does not consider wider architecture implications sufficiently. Phases B to D share common steps to establish the baseline and target architectures, and then an initial roadmap is developed in Phase E before being finalised in Phase F where more detailed work packages are defined. Phase G concentrates on ensuring conformance of solutions with the target architecture and Phase H is a continual process of maintaining and monitoring the enterprise architecture and initiating new cycles.
The structure of the TOGAF standard is divided into seven parts:
Other key aspects of TOGAF include the Architecture Repository and the Enterprise Continuum. A lot of information is generated from doing EA, and the information needs to be effective managed in order for it to be useful and re-usable. The repository is where the information is stored and referenced. It gets built up over time, and at the start might only contain reference models and material. The The Enterprise Continuum effectively provides contextual views of the Architecture Repository and a model for structuring and classifying those views.
The manual for all of the above is nearly 800 pages long, and you can imagine that used in its entirety TOGAF would be a very heavy weight framework. However, TOGAF is designed to be tailored and there are steps in the Preliminary phase to do just that. This tailoring aspect will be very important to the University’s start in using TOGAF effectively, and it is likely that it will need refinement over time as we all become more familiar with using the framework.